Wall Street Journal Suggests Method for Lowering Bitcoin ...

Very good article and video about Bitcoin in Wall Street Journal predicting "2014 is probably gonna be a pretty big year for Bitcoin"!

Very good article and video about Bitcoin in Wall Street Journal predicting submitted by BitCyprus to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Propy mentioned in a Wall Street Journal article "Bitcoin Is Creeping Into Real Estate Deals"

Propy mentioned in a Wall Street Journal article submitted by PropyCMPeter to PropyInc [link] [comments]

Wall Street Journal Article: Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund Makes Monster Bet on Bitcoin

Updated Jan. 2, 2018 7:57 p.m. ET
One of the biggest names in Silicon Valley is placing a moonshot bet on bitcoin.
Founders Fund, the venture-capital firm co-founded by Peter Thiel, has amassed hundreds of millions of dollars of the volatile cryptocurrency, people familiar with the matter said. The bet has been spread across several of the firm’s most recent funds, the people said, including one that began investing in mid-2017 and made bitcoin one of its first investments.
Founders and Mr. Thiel, 50 years old, are well-known for early investments in companies like Facebook Inc. that sometimes take years to come to fruition. The bitcoin bet is quickly showing promise. Founders bought around $15 million to $20 million in bitcoin, and it has told investors the firm’s haul is now worth hundreds of millions of dollars after the digital currency’s ripping rise in the past year.
It isn’t clear if Founders has sold any of its holdings yet. The bet hasn’t been previously reported.
Bitcoin vaulted last year from a fringe area of Wall Street interest to the most talked-about asset in the financial world. The currency, essentially a digital form of money with no government or central bank behind it, started 2017 trading around $1,000, then shot to near $20,000 as individual and institutional investors alike ramped up speculating on its rise. From its all-time high reached in mid-December, the price chopped almost in half over the rest of the month.
Prices as of late Tuesday afternoon were up 10% to $14,783, after ending 2017 at about $14,000, according to research site CoinDesk. Bitcoin spiked after The Wall Street Journal reported Founders’ investment.
Relatively few mainstream investors have bought large sums of bitcoin, scared off by concerns about cybersecurity and liquidity, as well as more mundane fears of investment losses. JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive James Dimon famously called the digital currency a “fraud,” while Bridgewater Associates founder Raymond Dalio said it was a bubble. Even some of those who do own it are cautious about speaking too publicly, lest they draw the attention of hackers.
The late-year price plunge has also spooked some. On Dec. 22, the prominent investor Michael Novogratz said he was delaying launching a crypto-focused hedge fund for outside investors, stating “we didn’t like market conditions for new investors.” South Korea announced last week it would crack down on cryptocurrency trading, an ominous sign given that the country at one point accounted for as much as one-fourth of global bitcoin trading activity.
Founders began buying in for its investors before the recent volatility, the people familiar with the matter said.
The billionaire Mr. Thiel is an outspoken libertarian who co-founded digital payments service PayPal Holdings Inc. and made headlines as a prominent booster of President Donald Trump. He serves on the president’s technology advisory council. Mr. Thiel previously ran a multibillion-dollar hedge fund focused on global macroeconomic trends, and had some success navigating the financial crisis before racking up investment losses by investing in havens and missing out on the subsequent rebound.
Bitcoin 101: What It Is, How to Invest The virtual currency bitcoin continues surging to new highs as a frenzy of investors get in on the action. WSJ's Paul Vigna explains what you need to know, and how to invest should you want to join the mania. Photo: Alexander Hotz/The Wall Street Journal.
What You Can Buy With Bitcoin: A $10 Pizza for $76 Bitcoin is a virtual currency, but very few people use it to actually pay for things because of transaction fees and its rising value. WSJ's Thomas Di Fonzo takes to the streets of New York to try to spend bitcoin at brick-and-mortar establishments.
As a venture capitalist, Mr. Thiel and Founders fund are among the most successful in Silicon Valley. Founders has more than $3 billion under management and has taken stakes in more-than 100 companies, including Facebook, Airbnb Inc., SpaceX and Lyft. More recent investments include the crypto-focused hedge funds Metastable Capital and Polychain Capital, which puts money into blockchain companies.
Mr. Thiel made the decision to buy up bitcoin together with Founders’ other investment partners, a person familiar with the matter said.
In an October onstage interview at an investment conference in Saudi Arabia, Mr. Thiel described cryptocurrencies as “charismatic.”
“While I’m skeptical of most of them, I do think people are a little bit underestimating bitcoin, specifically, because it is like a reserve form of money,” Mr. Thiel said. “If bitcoin ends up being the cyber equivalent of gold, it has great potential.”
By buying bitcoin outright, as opposed to backing other companies doing business in the space, Founders would seem to be breaking with its investing tradition, an investor said. But in communications with investors, Founders representatives have sought to cast the investment as a high-risk, high-reward wager similar to its other venture bets, the people familiar with the matter said.
The representatives have told firm backers that a cascade of cash into technology companies has stretched their valuations to historic highs, making stakes in startups as dangerous a risk as ever. Bitcoin, on the other hand, could multiply several times over in the coming years.
Thanks to its rise, the bitcoin investment is already estimated as the most valuable in the Founders’ most recent, $1.3 billion venture fund. People close to the firm said that the fund hasn’t made many investments yet.
Founders has also warned investors that bitcoin does share one potentially perilous similarity with more traditional venture capital investments: The digital currency could be worth nothing, or close to it, in the end.
Corrections & Amplifications Bitcoin reached its all-time high in mid-December. An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that it reached the level in November.
submitted by blossbloss to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

[uncensored-r/Bitcoin] Big time article in Wall Street journal today.

The following post by Turbodiesel67 is being replicated because some comments within the post(but not the post itself) have been silently removed.
The original post can be found(in censored form) at this link:
np.reddit.com/ Bitcoin/comments/71z7he
The original post's content was as follows:
WSJ has a glowing interview/article with Balaji Srinivasan about the future of Bitcoin. Nothing about a bubble, nothing about frauds or scams. This is a tacit endorsement by the best financial paper in the world.
The paper describes bitcoin and the blockchain in general as the "internet of money" and describes how it is revolutionizing everything in finance. It goes on to describe how China is trying to manipulate bitcoin in order to facilitate their own currency tied to the renminbi, or to capture bitcoin for themselves. WSJ explains how china created the great firewall shortly after the internet was invented, and now they're trying to do the same with blockchains and crypto... China isn't banning bitcoin. They plan on regulating it themselves.
This is the most positive sign I have seen around bitcoin in a long time. Wall Street journal putting out a positive article about BTC is a huge progress.
submitted by censorship_notifier to noncensored_bitcoin [link] [comments]

01-23 19:03 - 'Who to blame for the 100 billion crash in Bitcoin and all cryptos? Coinmarketcap.com (legit article from Wall Street Journal)' (self.Bitcoin) by /u/MgKx removed from /r/Bitcoin within 125-135min

'''
This is not a joke [link]1
'''
Who to blame for the 100 billion crash in Bitcoin and all cryptos? Coinmarketcap.com (legit article from Wall Street Journal)
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: MgKx
1: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-programmer-at-the-center-of-a-100-billion-crypto-storm-1516708800
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

Wow, Great video and article from the Wall Street Journal: "Bitcoin and the Digital-Currency Revolution"

Wow, Great video and article from the Wall Street Journal: submitted by ImNotRocketSurgeon to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Who to blame for the 100 billion crash in Bitcoin and all cryptos? Coinmarketcap.com (legit article from Wall Street Journal) /r/Bitcoin

Who to blame for the 100 billion crash in Bitcoin and all cryptos? Coinmarketcap.com (legit article from Wall Street Journal) /Bitcoin submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Wall Street Journal Article: Peter Thiels Founders Fund Makes Monster Bet on Bitcoin /r/Bitcoin

Wall Street Journal Article: Peter Thiels Founders Fund Makes Monster Bet on Bitcoin /Bitcoin submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Big time article in Wall Street journal today. /r/Bitcoin

Big time article in Wall Street journal today. /Bitcoin submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Slightly misleading Wall Street Journal Article.. /r/Bitcoin

Slightly misleading Wall Street Journal Article.. /Bitcoin submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

The Wall Street Journal's recent article about Bitcoin

The Wall Street Journal's recent article about Bitcoin submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

The Wall Street Journal's recent article about Bitcoin

The Wall Street Journal's recent article about Bitcoin submitted by HodlersCapital to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Wall Street Journal Article about Mark Karpeles /r/Bitcoin

Wall Street Journal Article about Mark Karpeles /Bitcoin submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

09-11 05:52 - 'China to Shut Bitcoin Exchanges Wall Street Journal Article' (wsj.com) by /u/everwhat1 removed from /r/Bitcoin within 83-93min

China to Shut Bitcoin Exchanges Wall Street Journal Article
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: everwhat1
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

Article on Bitcoin in Wall Street Journal

Article on Bitcoin in Wall Street Journal submitted by solarchaos to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Is Hedgeye Founder Keith McCullough Full if Shit?

So this dude says he sold all of his Bitcoin a few days ago because he sees the economy heading into Quad4 in this new quarter. Okay, fine. That means he must have spent the months and years before that buying and accumulating.
Thing is, I found a Wall Street Journal article from the first quarter of this year that says he was predicting the same thing to happen in second quarter of this same year.
So this smells fishy to me. Wouldn’t he have sold everything before second quarter? I think he’s full of shit. And he has no idea what makes Bitcoin valuable.
submitted by FellatioFellas to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Hoy vence el plazo para que Trump logre un paquete de ayuda antes de las elecciones



Este martes en horas de la noche vencerá el plazo en Estados Unidos (EE.UU.) para alcanzar un acuerdo de ayuda por $2,2 billones antes de las elecciones presidenciales del 3 de noviembre venidero.
El propósito de esta iniciativa es aprobar una ley que proporcione a hogares y empresas fondos adicionales contra el Covid-19.
La presidenta de la Cámara de Representantes de la nación norteamericana, de mayoría demócrata, Nancy Pelosi, dijo a la Casa Blanca el domingo que tiene hasta este 20 de octubre para llegar a un acuerdo de estímulo fiscal.
De lo contrario, es poco probable que se apruebe la ayuda antes del proceso electoral del próximo mes, informó The Wall Street Journal.
En una carta que envió a sus colegas demócratas, Pelosi comentó el estado de sus conversaciones con el secretario del Tesoro, Steven Mnuchin.
«Las negociaciones para el alivio del coronavirus continuaron durante el fin de semana, y el secretario Mnuchin envió el texto esperado sobre las pruebas. Si bien hubo algunas noticias alentadoras, queda mucho trabajo por hacer», señala en la misiva.
Agrega que es «optimista de que podamos llegar a un acuerdo antes de las elecciones. Con ese fin, escribimos un lenguaje a medida que negociamos las prioridades, de modo que estemos totalmente preparados para avanzar una vez que lleguemos a un acuerdo».

El monto y el motivo de la discordia

Los demócratas de la Cámara de Representantes esperan la aprobación de un paquete de 2,2 billones de dólares.
En su estrategia de campaña, los demócratas alegan la necesidad de «actuar con urgencia para proteger las vidas y los medios de subsistencia del pueblo estadounidense».
En su carta, Pelosi habla del «impacto en términos de la disparidad que enfrentan las comunidades de color».
«Un niño latino tiene ocho veces más probabilidades de tener que ir al hospital debido al Covid-19 que un niño blanco, y un niño negro tiene cinco veces más probabilidades. Queremos que todos nuestros niños estén protegidos», expresa.
Agrega que los niños se ven además afectados «por la negativa de la Casa Blanca de ampliar el Crédito Tributario por Hijos, el Crédito Tributario por Hijos y Dependientes y el Crédito Tributario por Ingreso del Trabajo, al tiempo que continúan los beneficios fiscales para algunos de los más ricos de Estados Unidos».
Si bien el presidente Donald Trump ha dicho que está preparado para negociar su propuesta, de 1,8 billones de dólares, la mayoría republicana en el Senado pretende aprobar un paquete mucho más modesto.
Si el paquete no se aprueba antes de las elecciones, podría ser en febrero de 2021 cuando ocurra, dijo al diario el representante Tom Reed (RN.Y.).

Conversaciones de última hora

Este lunes, Pelosi y Mnuchin, conversaron telefónicamente por cerca de una hora para reducir sus diferencias sobre el paquete de ayuda.
El subjefe de Personal de Pelosi, Drew Hammill, escribió en Twitter: «El Presidente sigue esperando que, al final del día del martes, tengamos claridad sobre si seremos capaces de aprobar un proyecto de ley antes de las elecciones”.
En esa llamada «continuaron reduciendo sus diferencias. El Presidente ha encargado a los titulares de los comités que reconcilien las diferencias con sus homólogos republicanos en áreas clave».

El paquete de estímulo y las criptomonedas

A mediados de mayo el valor de bitcoin superó los 9.500 dólares, tras la aprobación, en abril de este año, del proyecto de ley de paquete de estímulo masivo Covid-19 para la población de EE.UU., por un billón de dólares.
Este aumento pareció deberse a que muchos beneficiarios invirtieron su primer cheque de estímulo de $1.200 en la compra de bitcoins, informó Morocotacoin.
Se estima que debido a esas compras aumentó el precio del bitcoin, ya que para el 15 de abril se encontraba en 6.727 dólares y ya el 15 de mayo se ubicó en 9.523 dólares.
Ahora expertos en cripto mercado debaten si los estadounidenses harán lo mismo con un nuevo cheque de estímulo.
De hecho, a las 7:25 UTC este martes (3:25 am, hora de Venezuela), el precio del bitcoin rompió la barrera de los $11.850 por primera vez en casi siete semanas.
Datos de CryptoCompare muestran que el precio de la primera criptomoneda se cotizó una hora más tarde en $11.734, 2,3% más que en las últimas 24 horas.
submitted by Morocotacoin to noticias_en_espanol [link] [comments]

Hoy vence el plazo para que Trump logre un paquete de ayuda antes de las elecciones

Hoy vence el plazo para que Trump logre un paquete de ayuda antes de las elecciones
https://preview.redd.it/68en5zrtr9u51.png?width=696&format=png&auto=webp&s=603393b4e1cdcf142ca9785416b384d91d77d531
Este martes en horas de la noche vencerá el plazo en Estados Unidos (EE.UU.) para alcanzar un acuerdo de ayuda por $2,2 billones antes de las elecciones presidenciales del 3 de noviembre venidero.
El propósito de esta iniciativa es aprobar una ley que proporcione a hogares y empresas fondos adicionales contra el Covid-19.
La presidenta de la Cámara de Representantes de la nación norteamericana, de mayoría demócrata, Nancy Pelosi, dijo a la Casa Blanca el domingo que tiene hasta este 20 de octubre para llegar a un acuerdo de estímulo fiscal.
De lo contrario, es poco probable que se apruebe la ayuda antes del proceso electoral del próximo mes, informó The Wall Street Journal.
En una carta que envió a sus colegas demócratas, Pelosi comentó el estado de sus conversaciones con el secretario del Tesoro, Steven Mnuchin.
«Las negociaciones para el alivio del coronavirus continuaron durante el fin de semana, y el secretario Mnuchin envió el texto esperado sobre las pruebas. Si bien hubo algunas noticias alentadoras, queda mucho trabajo por hacer», señala en la misiva.
Agrega que es «optimista de que podamos llegar a un acuerdo antes de las elecciones. Con ese fin, escribimos un lenguaje a medida que negociamos las prioridades, de modo que estemos totalmente preparados para avanzar una vez que lleguemos a un acuerdo».

El monto y el motivo de la discordia

Los demócratas de la Cámara de Representantes esperan la aprobación de un paquete de 2,2 billones de dólares.
En su estrategia de campaña, los demócratas alegan la necesidad de «actuar con urgencia para proteger las vidas y los medios de subsistencia del pueblo estadounidense».
En su carta, Pelosi habla del «impacto en términos de la disparidad que enfrentan las comunidades de color».
«Un niño latino tiene ocho veces más probabilidades de tener que ir al hospital debido al Covid-19 que un niño blanco, y un niño negro tiene cinco veces más probabilidades. Queremos que todos nuestros niños estén protegidos», expresa.
Agrega que los niños se ven además afectados «por la negativa de la Casa Blanca de ampliar el Crédito Tributario por Hijos, el Crédito Tributario por Hijos y Dependientes y el Crédito Tributario por Ingreso del Trabajo, al tiempo que continúan los beneficios fiscales para algunos de los más ricos de Estados Unidos».
Si bien el presidente Donald Trump ha dicho que está preparado para negociar su propuesta, de 1,8 billones de dólares, la mayoría republicana en el Senado pretende aprobar un paquete mucho más modesto.
Si el paquete no se aprueba antes de las elecciones, podría ser en febrero de 2021 cuando ocurra, dijo al diario el representante Tom Reed (RN.Y.).

Conversaciones de última hora

Este lunes, Pelosi y Mnuchin, conversaron telefónicamente por cerca de una hora para reducir sus diferencias sobre el paquete de ayuda.
El subjefe de Personal de Pelosi, Drew Hammill, escribió en Twitter: «El Presidente sigue esperando que, al final del día del martes, tengamos claridad sobre si seremos capaces de aprobar un proyecto de ley antes de las elecciones”.
En esa llamada «continuaron reduciendo sus diferencias. El Presidente ha encargado a los titulares de los comités que reconcilien las diferencias con sus homólogos republicanos en áreas clave».

El paquete de estímulo y las criptomonedas

A mediados de mayo el valor de bitcoin superó los 9.500 dólares, tras la aprobación, en abril de este año, del proyecto de ley de paquete de estímulo masivo Covid-19 para la población de EE.UU., por un billón de dólares.
Este aumento pareció deberse a que muchos beneficiarios invirtieron su primer cheque de estímulo de $1.200 en la compra de bitcoins, informó Morocotacoin.
Se estima que debido a esas compras aumentó el precio del bitcoin, ya que para el 15 de abril se encontraba en 6.727 dólares y ya el 15 de mayo se ubicó en 9.523 dólares.
Ahora expertos en cripto mercado debaten si los estadounidenses harán lo mismo con un nuevo cheque de estímulo.
De hecho, a las 7:25 UTC este martes (3:25 am, hora de Venezuela), el precio del bitcoin rompió la barrera de los $11.850 por primera vez en casi siete semanas.
Datos de CryptoCompare muestran que el precio de la primera criptomoneda se cotizó una hora más tarde en $11.734, 2,3% más que en las últimas 24 horas.
submitted by Morocotacoin to u/Morocotacoin [link] [comments]

Hoy vence el plazo para que Trump logre un paquete de ayuda antes de las elecciones

Hoy vence el plazo para que Trump logre un paquete de ayuda antes de las elecciones


Este martes en horas de la noche vencerá el plazo en Estados Unidos (EE.UU.) para alcanzar un acuerdo de ayuda por $2,2 billones antes de las elecciones presidenciales del 3 de noviembre venidero.
El propósito de esta iniciativa es aprobar una ley que proporcione a hogares y empresas fondos adicionales contra el Covid-19.
La presidenta de la Cámara de Representantes de la nación norteamericana, de mayoría demócrata, Nancy Pelosi, dijo a la Casa Blanca el domingo que tiene hasta este 20 de octubre para llegar a un acuerdo de estímulo fiscal.
De lo contrario, es poco probable que se apruebe la ayuda antes del proceso electoral del próximo mes, informó The Wall Street Journal.
En una carta que envió a sus colegas demócratas, Pelosi comentó el estado de sus conversaciones con el secretario del Tesoro, Steven Mnuchin.
«Las negociaciones para el alivio del coronavirus continuaron durante el fin de semana, y el secretario Mnuchin envió el texto esperado sobre las pruebas. Si bien hubo algunas noticias alentadoras, queda mucho trabajo por hacer», señala en la misiva.
Agrega que es «optimista de que podamos llegar a un acuerdo antes de las elecciones. Con ese fin, escribimos un lenguaje a medida que negociamos las prioridades, de modo que estemos totalmente preparados para avanzar una vez que lleguemos a un acuerdo».

El monto y el motivo de la discordia

Los demócratas de la Cámara de Representantes esperan la aprobación de un paquete de 2,2 billones de dólares.
En su estrategia de campaña, los demócratas alegan la necesidad de «actuar con urgencia para proteger las vidas y los medios de subsistencia del pueblo estadounidense».
En su carta, Pelosi habla del «impacto en términos de la disparidad que enfrentan las comunidades de color».
«Un niño latino tiene ocho veces más probabilidades de tener que ir al hospital debido al Covid-19 que un niño blanco, y un niño negro tiene cinco veces más probabilidades. Queremos que todos nuestros niños estén protegidos», expresa.
Agrega que los niños se ven además afectados «por la negativa de la Casa Blanca de ampliar el Crédito Tributario por Hijos, el Crédito Tributario por Hijos y Dependientes y el Crédito Tributario por Ingreso del Trabajo, al tiempo que continúan los beneficios fiscales para algunos de los más ricos de Estados Unidos».
Si bien el presidente Donald Trump ha dicho que está preparado para negociar su propuesta, de 1,8 billones de dólares, la mayoría republicana en el Senado pretende aprobar un paquete mucho más modesto.
Si el paquete no se aprueba antes de las elecciones, podría ser en febrero de 2021 cuando ocurra, dijo al diario el representante Tom Reed (RN.Y.).

Conversaciones de última hora

Este lunes, Pelosi y Mnuchin, conversaron telefónicamente por cerca de una hora para reducir sus diferencias sobre el paquete de ayuda.
El subjefe de Personal de Pelosi, Drew Hammill, escribió en Twitter: «El Presidente sigue esperando que, al final del día del martes, tengamos claridad sobre si seremos capaces de aprobar un proyecto de ley antes de las elecciones”.
En esa llamada «continuaron reduciendo sus diferencias. El Presidente ha encargado a los titulares de los comités que reconcilien las diferencias con sus homólogos republicanos en áreas clave».

El paquete de estímulo y las criptomonedas

A mediados de mayo el valor de bitcoin superó los 9.500 dólares, tras la aprobación, en abril de este año, del proyecto de ley de paquete de estímulo masivo Covid-19 para la población de EE.UU., por un billón de dólares.
Este aumento pareció deberse a que muchos beneficiarios invirtieron su primer cheque de estímulo de $1.200 en la compra de bitcoins, informó Morocotacoin.
Se estima que debido a esas compras aumentó el precio del bitcoin, ya que para el 15 de abril se encontraba en 6.727 dólares y ya el 15 de mayo se ubicó en 9.523 dólares.
Ahora expertos en cripto mercado debaten si los estadounidenses harán lo mismo con un nuevo cheque de estímulo.
De hecho, a las 7:25 UTC este martes (3:25 am, hora de Venezuela), el precio del bitcoin rompió la barrera de los $11.850 por primera vez en casi siete semanas.
Datos de CryptoCompare muestran que el precio de la primera criptomoneda se cotizó una hora más tarde en $11.734, 2,3% más que en las últimas 24 horas.
submitted by Morocotacoin to CryptoMexico [link] [comments]

Solution Life - New payments solution

Solution Life - New payments solution
Solution Life is an open-source platform that enables to create peer-to-peer marketplace and ecommerce applications.
https://preview.redd.it/ypmpkfwnb6s51.png?width=613&format=png&auto=webp&s=6936dbdd70f1626bb352a426f3b59383b8b8c9cc
Solution Life aims at building a global sharing economy, allowing buyers and sellers to use segments of goods and services (car sharing, service missions, home sharing, etc.) to transact on the open, distributed source web. Using Ethereum blockchain and Interplanetary File System (IPFS), the platform and its participants can interact with the peer-to-peer model, allowing the creation and placement of services and goods without going through traditional middle parties. We plan to build a large-scale commercial network:
• Exchange financial value directly (listing, transactions and service fees) from big corporations like Airbnb, Craigslist, Postmate, ... to individual buyers and retailers.
• Exchange financial value and strategic value (internal aggregation of customer and transaction data) from similar corporations to entire ecosystems
• Create new financial value for market participants who contribute to platform development (e.g. building new technology for the Solution Life platform, developing new vertical products and introducing new users and businesses)
• Build the open, distributed, and shared data layer to promote transparency and collaboration
• Allow the buyers and sellers in the world to transact without difficulty in converting currencies or tariffs
• Promote personal freedom by not allowing a corporation or central government to impose arbitrary and overly conventional rules of business operation. To conduct these ambitious goals, we created the Solution Life Platform with programs that encourage technologists, businesses and consumers to build, contribute, and expand the ecosystem. We plan to build a broad collection of vertical industry applications (e.g. short vacation rental, free software engineering, tutoring) built on standards and data sharing Solution Life. When writing this article, the Solution Life platform is currently in Mainnet Beta. Platform Version 1.0 is expected to be activated in Quarter 3/2020. While the majority of engineering work is being done by the core engineering team, we expect future developments, after launching platform 1.0 from developer, will come to open source community members Together, we will create the Internet economy of the future.
Details of Whitepaper:
• Why is a new model of peer to peer trading necessary?
• Benefits proposed on the Solution Life Platform
• Product strategy, main features and technical overview
• Overview of the Solution Life team and community
https://preview.redd.it/tzepfegpb6s51.png?width=759&format=png&auto=webp&s=62c9933e84e9945b5417591e406390d127fa1070
BACKGROUND
Since the appearance of the Internet, the digital marketplace has connected buyers and sellers of goods and services, allowing transactions that have never happened before. Craigslist launched in 1995 and dominated for many years in local and regional commerce. At the same time, eBay began to grow and create a whole new category of sales based on auction, creating a more efficient way of doing market business. Through 20 years of rapid change, many businesses on the Internet market in both B2C and B2B types have developed strongly. Currently, sharing economy markets such as Airbnb, Uber, Getaround, Fiverr and TaskRmus have been very successful in combining buyers and sellers of the sharing economy. Now, the use of distributed assets can be sold as easily as atomic items, and people around the world are exchanging their excess inventory, time, and skills for profit. New markets including the Gig economy, the service sector and the use of segment assets are particularly suitable to be basis for peer-to-peer systems built on blockchain. Most of the shared economic enterprises have some common points. Firstly, as a collection, these companies have made a big impact on the world. Consumers of the markets were able to improve their lives with access to products and services that they didn't have before. Vendors have been using these platforms to reach customers on a larger and easier scale than before. Each market creates a "private home" for consumers and suppliers to transact together, creating liquidity for that market. Secondly, most sharing economic enterprises follow the same growth cycle. Without a few exceptions, these famous markets are difficult to launch and grow. Enterprises in the market often have to start building with millions of dollars, and in terms of Uber and Airbnb, these two businesses spend billions of dollars to scale. That is also the reason why these businesses suffered serious losses in the early days. In fact, the corporation is subsidizing the use of marketplace for its users. However, due to the very positive cross-network effect, successful marketplace businesses can increase revenue exponentially over time, usually by charging a fee per transaction on the network. Network-effect enterprises, such as share economy market, are often enterprises occupying all directions and growing stage, gaining a disproportionate value from the network for corporation’s management and their shareholders. In many ways, they become the only dictator on the scale they achieve. Finally, although there are huge differences in user experience, business mechanics, and vertical specific features among companies on the Internet market, they all share many parts built and rebuild many times. Lyft, Postmate, and DoorDash themselves has designed their own solutions for user and supplier profiles, shopping experiences, matching algorithms, reviews, and ratings. This is proprietary technology that is valuable on one side. On the other hand, chasing useless things each time creates a new market vertically wasted time and effort. Consumers also create and manage dozens of accounts on these market enterprises themselves, each with their own personal data and transaction history.
In the last few years, blockchain technology innovators and investors have called teams to build peer-topeer versions of businesses in the current sharing economy and to trade the Internet in a more efficient way. P2P lodging sites like Airbnb have already begun to transform the lodging industry by making a public market in private housing. However, adoption may be limited by concerns about safety and security (guests) and property damage (hosts). By enabling a secure, tamper-proof system for managing digital credentials and reputation, we believe blockchain could help accelerate the adoption of P2P lodging and generate.” - Goldman Sachs Research (Blockchain: Putting Theory into Practice) Don Tapscott, the author of the "Blockchain Revolution", said that Bitcoin-based technology could be used to promote the interest in Uber and Airbnb. - The Wall Street Journal "It is difficult for middle parties to achieve sustainable growth in business," [Fritz Joussen] said. "These platforms [tourism middle parties] build accessibility by spending billions of dollars on advertising, and then they generate exclusive profits based on what they have with sales and marketing. They provide great sales and marketing services. Booking.com is a big brand but they make outstanding profits because they own proprietary structures. Blockchain will destroy this. "- Skift However, most of the infrastructure and transmission systems for building distributed-market applications did not exist before Solution Life was born. We aim to address the shortcomings of current market companies and are happy that we have launched the Solution Life Platform, which opens up peer-to-peer commerce with corresponding scale.
📷
ACTIVATE THE OVER THE COUNTER MARKET
Our vision is to build and develop a free service exchange on the new Internet. In order to do this, we have to build a simulation platform of most, if not all, of the functionality of a third-party intermediary on the blockchain and other distribution systems. This is an ambitious and technologically challenging goal, but we have already completed important milestones that demonstrate our technology and the realworld applications of the project. The Solution Life platform has 3 main elements, all of which are open sources:
• Solution Life enabled end user applications
• Solution Life platform for developers
• Solution Life's application protocol
Solution Life enables end user applications The Solution Life flagship marketplace app is our consumer marketplace product that allows buyers and sellers on the network to do business. It is available today on the web at shopSolution Life.com and on both iOS and Android mobile devices.
📷
Summary
For the past two decades, Internet marketplaces and e-commerce stores have changed the way that buyers and sellers connect, creating new opportunities for the exchange of goods and services. However, these marketplaces have always been governed by centralized companies that maintain their individual monopolies on data, transaction and other service fees, and ultimately, user choice. With blockchain and other distributed technologies beginning to hit the mainstream, the world is poised for a new wave of decentralized commerce. SLC is bringing change and innovation to the global peer-to-peer economy. We're excited by the opportunity to lower fees, increase innovation, free customer and transaction data, and decrease censorship and unnecessary regulation. We are building a platform that invites other interested parties including developers and entrepreneurs to build this technology and community with us, altogether working to create the peer-to-peer economy of tomorrow. We hope you’ll join us on this exciting journey.
TOKEN SOLUTION LIFE (SLC)
The Solution Life Token (also known as SLC) is a utility token that serves multiple purposes in ensuring the health and growth of the network. The ERC20 contract is live on the Ethereum network today at:
0x4d44D6c288b7f32fF676a4b2DAfD625992f8Ffbd.
At a high level, this token is intended to serve a number of key functions on the platform. First, the SLC is a multi-purpose incentive token that is intended to drive the behavior of end users, developers, market operators, and other ecosystem participants. Additionally, the SLC is an exchange intermediary that can be used for payments between buyers and sellers on the platform. Ultimately, it is intended that SLC will serve a vital part in future network governance. Since November 2020, the Solution Life token has been used to encourage various forms of participation from the platform's ecosystem participants. Token Solution Life is used to reward users, developers, marketplace operators and / or other participants for performing activities and services conducive to Platform development. Solution Life Rewards Solution Life is an incentive program targeted at end users on the Platform. Buyers and sellers on the platform have been able to earn SLC since our inaugural Solution Life Rewards campaign in Nov of 2020. Solution Life Rewards enables everyone to have a stake in the network. We’ve intentionally designed the program so that even novice, non-technical users can participate. With Solution Life Rewards, users can get SLC from account creation and identity verification. One of the best ways to network is through referrals. As such, end users can also earn tokens by inviting new users. This creates more confidence between the buyer and the seller. Users can also earn SLC by following Solution Life's social networking sites or promoting project news on public channels.
To encourage trading volume on our Solution Life Platform, we also offer a refund mechanism for users who purchase from reputable sellers on our network. Solution Life Commissions Encouraging marketplace developers and managers to use the Solution Life platform is essential. Therefore, we launched an advertising and promotion program, creating an integrated business model for the decentralized marketplace running on Solution Life. Merchants on Solution Life apps can promote their listings using SLCs for greater visibility on search and browse results on our preferred and partner apps. The only way to join this program is to pay with SLC. When a merchant creates a listing, they can add a commission paid in SLC to their listing. This SLC is placed on escrow in the Marketplace Smart Contract.
submitted by slctoken to u/slctoken [link] [comments]

My Very Provisional List of COVID Anomalies, Red/ False Flags and Clear Indications of Scumbaggery. LIHOP, MIHOP Or HOAX/SCAM? Def Not As Described. Need Your Help To Source References and Links For Existing Categories And Add New Ones. This is WOEFULLY INCOMPLETE. I Know I've Missed Tonnes...Ideas?

My Very Provisional List of COVID Anomalies, Red/ False Flags and Clear Indications of Scumbaggery. LIHOP, MIHOP Or HOAX/SCAM? Def Not As Described. Need Your Help To Source References and Links For Existing Categories And Add New Ones. This is WOEFULLY INCOMPLETE. I Know I've Missed Tonnes...Ideas?
Here’s my Top 22 list of suspicious shenanigans and red flags surrounding the COVID narrative:

  1. The Imperial College Death data - Neil Ferguson and Gates-funded Imperial College, London Model that ‘persuaded’ Johnson and Trump to lockdown. 500K deaths in UK and 2.2m deaths projected in US, EVEN WITH LOCKDOWN. Less than 10% accuracy but 110% alarmist, and evidence that the coding was deliberately flawed and designed to inflate numbers. Gates funding everyone involved in the staged 'debacle'.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8164121/Professor-predicted-500-000-Britons-die-coronavirus-accused-having-patchy-record.html
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2020/05/16/coding-led-lockdown-totally-unreliable-buggy-mess-say-experts/
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/who-controls-british-government-response-covid19-part-one
https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/
Ferguson, with a terrifyingly consistent track record for hyping minor viruses that fail to transpire into pandemics (Swine Flu, Bird Flu, BSE etc), failing upwards as a ‘safe pair of hands‘.
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/08/so-the-real-scandal-is-why-did-anyone-ever-listen-to-this-guy/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11565369/useless-professor-neil-ferguson-antonia-staats/
EDIT: I‘ve reposted, but thought I’d put back the 95% that disappeared some minutes ago....
2) Ferguson’s blasé attitude to his affair during lockdown - clearly not too worried for his lovers’ family, if he genuinely believed COVID was a threat. No "error of judgement", just a man who knew there was nothing to fear.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/06/ministers-hypocrisy-over-neil-ferguson-lockdown-affair
3) Hospitals cleared of patients in readiness for a pandemic that never came. Desperate for cash, doctors and nurses were financially incentivised to put down patients dying with/ of COVID on death certificates to gain payments. In US $13,000 per patient, and $39,000 per patient on ventilator etc.
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/72070/this-is-how-much-hospitals-are-making-if-patients-have-coronavirus/index.html
Footage of empty hospitals worldwide: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrJ9yaUOVKs
Nurses furloughed, sent home for suspected virus without testing. Nurses - with nothing better to do - on TikTok etc:
Nurses slammed for filming TikTok showing them carrying coronavirus 'body-bag':
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/nurses-slammed-filming-tiktok-showing-21960411
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMHU6MtPVqQ etc
4) Games played with age and numbers, proof that only the elderly and very sick elderly were dying, but less of pneumonia and flu than in previous years. Median age of 79 in US and 82 in UK. Meanwhile whole country on lockdown.
"The median age of the deceased in most countries (including Italy) is over 80 years (e.g. 86 years in Sweden) and only about 4% of the deceased had no serious preconditions. The age and risk profile of deaths thus essentially corresponds to normal mortality."
https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/
https://medium.com/wintoncentre/what-have-been-the-fatal-risks-of-covid-particularly-to-children-and-younger-adults-a5cbf7060c49
(table from 2/7 down the page...)
5) When this became apparent, initial scare stories in press about children dying of virus, later proven to have no merit, just to ensure the hysteria was generalised. Meanwhile, probability of a child dying from the 'virus' is 35m to 1.

https://preview.redd.it/exxx18mdn8c51.png?width=2224&format=png&auto=webp&s=d9f00fd75d396a945a4244eab07b37325706eca3
"The second row shows that 2 deaths have been recorded among over 7 million school children aged between 5 and 14 (around 1 in 3.5 million), an extremely low risk — although additional deaths may be reported following coroners’ investigations. Over the last five years, there has been an average of 94 deaths registered over this 9-week period for those aged 5–14, and so the 2 Covid deaths represents only 2% of the normal risk faced by this group. That is, whatever average risk they would have faced in these 9 weeks if Covid had never existed — a risk which was extraordinarily low — was increased by Covid by only 2%."
from: https://medium.com/wintoncentre/what-have-been-the-fatal-risks-of-covid-particularly-to-children-and-younger-adults-a5cbf7060c49
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/08/kawasaki-like-disease-affecting-children-caused-coronavirus/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8264135/UK-says-children-died-syndrome-linked-COVID-19.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8316223/Up-100-British-children-mysterious-inflammatory-disease-linked-COVID-19.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8278963/Ill-youngsters-directly-exposed-corona-victims-refused-tests-medics.html
6) The ludicrous claim that they had never considered economic and psychological DEATH toll of lockdown.
There was a press conference in June on BBC, where they said "saving lives" from the virus was considered more important. Hard to believe, but I can't find the footage yet...
"One of the most consistent themes that emerges from the minutes of SAGE meetings is how the Government repeatedly expected its scientists to account for the economic impact of lockdown restrictions – even though SAGE was not doing any economic modelling."
https://bylinetimes.com/2020/07/03/sagegate-part-one-treasury-and-downing-street-advisors-delayed-covid-19-lockdown/
7) Doctors globally openly being told they can save paperwork and earn money by basing cause of death on ASSUMPTION of COVID, based on the vaguest of pretexts and symptoms.
https://www.inquirer.com/health/coronavirus/coronavirus-covid19-cause-death-certificate-pcom-20200401.html
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/anti-vax-doctor-covid-19-death-certificates-984407/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlGkCABfyLw
Also, from the UK...Health Secretary Matt Hancock calls for urgent review into coronavirus death data in England.
It follows confirmation from Public Health England that reported deaths may have included people who tested positive months before they died.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-53443724
8) The propaganda campaign against any form of alternative to vaccine (Vitamin C and D, African cures, HCQ etc)
“The Government’s leading body for Covid19 drug trials – led by the controversial character Professor Peter Horby – Oxford’s Professor of Emerging Infectious Diseases and Global Health and heading the vaccine programme - stands accused of grossly misleading negative trial results for the coronavirus management drug Hydroxychloroqhine. (Conflict of interest, surely?)
The lead story in today’s France Soir – a long-respected and unaligned French daily – presents compelling evidence to suggest that the Whitehall/Cabinet Covid19 “advice” team cannot be trusted….and raises yet more doubts about BBC complicity in a false Coronavirus narrative.”
https://jonsnewplace.wordpress.com/2020/06/22/explosive-more-uk-covid-experts-facing-serious-data-manipulation-charges/
http://www.francesoir.fsociete-sante/remdesivir-une-molecule-dinteret-therapeutique-tres-discutable-sur-le-covid-19-partie ( in French)
The [Lancet’s] claim that hydroxychloroquine increases the risk of death in Covid-19 patients has been used by rivals as a stick to beat the US President, who has himself been taking the drug and hailed it a 'game-changer' in the war on coronavirus**.**
Mounting doubts over the study's reliability culminated yesterday when the authors retracted their study from the Lancet medical journal, whose editorial standards have also been thrown into question.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8391779/Lancet-paper-warned-against-Covid-19-drug-flares-accusations-political-point-scoring.html
“The Deputy Chief Investigator of the Recovery Trial, Prof. Martin Landray, gave an interview to France-Soir. What he revealed was quite remarkable.
Firstly, the mortality rate of the hydroxychloroquine patients was a staggering 25.7%.
The recommended hydroxychloroquine dose for an adult in the UK is no more than 200 — 400 mg per day. In France, 1800 mg per day is considered to be lethal poisoning.”
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/the-hydroxychloroquine-scandal
https://time.com/5840148/coronavirus-cure-covid-organic-madagasca
https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-vitamin-c-myth.html
9) The saturation of Gates into the narrative at every level. His hallowed and unquestioned presence in media as expert, the only Moses who can lead us out of this wilderness with his magic potions, release us from our prisons with his benevolence. His financial connections through BMGF to NIH, CDC, WHO, BBC, Guardian, CNN etc and of course every pharmaceutical company in existence....
https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/
Amazing Polly (pretty much every video this year):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm19xYwJ2nQ
BBC compromised:

“Transforming lives through media”? Gates and the CIA? Can we give up the pretence that neutral Auntie speaks for - or represents - us and our best interests?
Charities and foundations - without transparency, oversight and apparently universally trusted. Call your genocidal plans ‘charity’ and not only will you look like a philanthrApist, but people will even donate to their own demise.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaaction/about/funding
EDIT: For further information, I just found this webpage:
https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/revealed-bbc-charity-receives-millions-in-funding-from-gates-foundation/
UK Guardian compromised:
Hear the Guardian is regrettably letting 180 staff go this week. Hopefully BMGF can find them suitable homes...
https://hectordrummond.com/2020/05/22/the-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundations-sponsorship-of-the-guardian/
From the article:
“This story came from a Guardian sub-section called ‘Global Development‘.
But then I came across this 2010 Guardian story about how the Guardian has started up this new ‘Global Development’ site in partnership with… the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
So much information on Gates...almost “paralysed” with possibilities. Ideas?
10) Recent US and UK stories where people clearly dying of other things - cancer, suicide, motorcycle accidents etc are ascribed to COVID. Officially, George Floyd’s death should have been ascribed to COVID, since I believe he tested positive during autopsy. Might have led to a very different world...
https://cbs12.com/news/local/man-who-died-in-motorcycle-crash-counted-as-covid-19-death-in-florida-report
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/george-floyd-death-autopsy-coronavirus-protests-a9548386.html
HighImpactFix video about case number “massage” and motorcycle anomalies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olz03OPeijM&feature=youtu.be
11) Recent US and UK stories of the deceitful practices by which:
i) the case numbers are conflated with all death numbers on certain days
ii) Dying "of" vs "with" COVID
iii) anyone who dies after testing positive is a COVID death
iv) cases being reported and subliminally conflated with deaths by the media, when death numbers fell too low to keep the public sufficiently terrified to accept coming measures
v) case numbers merely made up or inflated by a factor of ten, in Florida’s case last week.
https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/why-no-one-can-ever-recover-from-covid-19-in-england-a-statistical-anomaly/
Too many to include all here, but the recent Florida 'mistake' is here:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/florida-labs-found-significantly-inflating-positive-covid-testing-rate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta7g8BgKAXE
If this is a genuine event, what possible reason would there be to commit fraud in so many ways to keep it looking genuine, besides the need to control demolish the world economy and vaccine-shill?
12) Event 201. Drill gone live. Nuff said.
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/videos.html
CORBETT REPORT:
https://www.corbettreport.com/mml2020/
Amazing Polly:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7O5RylrMUV8F/
13) The fact that there have been no surprises at all since the crisis began. Every next step had been telegraphed in the media well in advance. Everything began with the notion that a vaccine would be the only solution and the narrative has remained remarkably consistent to Event201.
14) Even with all of these statistical somersaults, the death numbers this year are not far from what they’ve been in previous years. Pneumonia and flu deaths are suspiciously down.

2020 - 6509 flu deaths in five months (Feb-June)
2020 - 6509 flu deaths in five months (Feb-June)
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1113051/number-reported-deaths-from-covid-pneumonia-and-flu-us/
Compared with:

2019- Flu killed 34,157 - more than twice amount for a similar period of five months this year.
2019 Flu killed 34,157 - more than twice amount for a similar period of five months this year.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1124915/flu-deaths-number-us/
MUCH, MUCH MORE DATA NEEDED HERE....
15) That in the space of four months, they have managed to capitalise on this crisis and remove so many rights from us permanently. An opportunity for which they’ve been waiting for years, COVID sped up the process and kept us otherwise preoccupied.
Here is my list of achieved or achievable hidden agenda:
In no particular order:
  1. Controlled demolition of the stock market/ global economy. Global reset etc
  2. Transhumanist/ AI rollout (post-human, Gates patents for human batteries linked with cryptocurrency (60606). https://news.bitcoin.com/microsoft-cryptocurrency-system/
  3. Vaccine adulation and promotion (Gates etc promising vaccine = release from captivity - pharmaceutical companies in league with WHO to drum up mandatory sales)
  4. Expediting the climate change agenda, conflating it with the virus as a call for world government and global sustainability.
  5. Plus RFID/ ID2020 tracking through vaccines (mark of the beast, without which no transaction/ employment will be possible)
  6. Demonisation and eradication of cash (total financial dominion)
  7. Mass unemployment and Universal Credit system linked to Social Credit.
  8. Bank (and corporate) bailouts – this time round it looks legitimate and necessary, no public outcry.
  9. Using and conditioning us to the concept of quarantining as a future method of control should there be any hint of unrest.
  10. Cultification of the NHS to the point of a unifying religion (clapping and donations and lionisation of medical staff during what must be the quietest time in their history)
  11. Legitimation of multiculturalism and immigration (race-baiting through NHS and volunteers, #youclapforusnow
  12. A shot in the arm for the MSM and government as a whole: no longer irrelevant and dying, people watching 24-7 since pandemic. Taking attention away from alternative media.
  13. Privatisation of NHS/ public services – corporations will step in to ‘save’ us (public gratitude replacing scepticism)
  14. Makes government look noble and heroic (wartime/ WW2 mentality fostered)
  15. COVID19 as cover story for 5G radiation/ environmental pollution/ vaccine damage etc
  16. Mass Surveillance – using 5G ‘for our safety’ to track and trace
  17. Opportunity to pass draconian laws against human rights (assembly, sectioning, travel, speech)
  18. Social alienation/ conformity as preference/ patriotic duty
  19. Prevention of assembly in order to protest draconian laws
  20. Depopulation in stages (elderly first, then with vaccines and suicides/ bankruptcy etc due to system collapse)
  21. Censorship of social media and social discourse in general
  22. Installation of 5G during lockdown to avoid scrutiny
  23. Effecting the transition of the workplace, shopping district and school to the home, ending community and all nourishing human interactions.
  24. The ‘new normal’ - social revolution and culture creation through social distancing/ queuing for shops/reinvention of the word essential/ mask wearing etc
  25. Destruction of small and medium sized businesses and the high street in general
  26. Fauci’s early dismissive comments about virus, herd immunity and futility of masks, before the script was revised.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-fauci-in-march-masks-make-you-feel-a-little-bit-better-but-unnecessary-for-general-population-warns-of-unintended-consequences
”You don’t need a mask.”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUHsEmlIoE4
To the NEJM, he described COVID in March as a flu, with similar numbers predicted to suffer.
“WOW! Dr. Fauci in New England Journal of Medicine Concedes the Coronavirus Mortality Rate May Be Much Closer to a Very Bad Flu”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/wow-dr-fauci-in-new-england-journal-of-medicine-concedes-the-coronavirus-mortality-rate-may-be-much-closer-to-a-very-bad-flu/
Why the u-turn? Surely we define our experts by their consistency.
F William Engdahl article:
https://fort-russ.com/amp/2020/04/shedding-light-on-the-dishonorable-record-of-dr-fauci-a-real-mengele/
Christine Grady (Fauci’s wife):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkYen0g4TRU
17) Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock and Nadine Dorries - The statistical chances (14%) of three members of the UK Cabinet (made up of 22 people), including the prime minister, actually catching it and one almost dying apparently, right before reversing his decision to let it pass.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/full-list-of-senior-government-figures-affected-by-coronavirus
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51827356
A very intentionally dramatic start to our lockdown, announced by Johnson from his "death-bed", ensuring all were in the appropriate state of panic:
"Boris Johnson: Hospital doctors were ready to announce my death"
https://www.politico.eu/article/boris-johnson-hospital-doctors-were-ready-to-announce-my-death/
18) Meanwhile, racism knocks the virus off the front pages and our minds for a few weeks, but we’re meant to go right back to taking it seriously when requested.
https://summit.news/2020/06/05/1200-public-health-experts-sign-letter-advocating-mass-gatherings-because-white-supremacy-is-a-bigger-threat-than-covid-19/
19) The many proven fake media stories...of long lines for testing and hospital footage from NY, mannequins in beds etc
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cbs-news-accused-by-project-veritas-of-faking-footage-in-michigan-coronavirus-testing-report
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BUBTtUTOII
https://nypost.com/2020/04/01/cbs-admits-to-using-footage-from-italy-in-report-about-nyc/
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-video-operating-dummy-coron/partly-false-claim-video-shows-doctors-operating-on-a-dummy-to-exaggerate-extent-of-coronavirus-crisis-idUSKBN21P2Q8
20) International care home scandals - Deliberately mandating coronavirus carriers into crowded care homes to bump up death toll and concomitant hysteria, kill off elderly...murder?
"It is remarkable how many deaths during this pandemic have occurred in care homes. According to the Office for National Statistics, nearly 50,000 care home deaths were registered in the 11 weeks up to 22 May in England and Wales — 25,000 more than you would expect at this time of the year. Two out of five care homes in England have had a coronavirus outbreak; in the north-east, it’s half.
Not all these deaths, however, have been attributed to Covid-19. Even when death certificates do mention it, it is not always clear that it is the disease that was the ultimate cause of death..."
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/dying-of-neglect-the-other-covid-care-home-scandal
"The daughter of a 91-year-old gran who died of Covid-19 she contracted in a care home is demanding to know why her mum was “sacrificed” by ministers.
Retired teacher Anne Duncan died in Edinburgh’s Western General Hospitaltwo days after her family managed to force a move out of the care home in the city where they feared she would die alone.
Her daughter Linda hit out at what she called a “scandalous” policy to release coronavirus patients into care homes and called for her mum’s death to be investigated as part of a wider review."
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/health/scots-gran-who-died-covid-22172074
Also, more than 40% of US ‘virus‘ deaths occur in nursing homes:
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/504885-over-40-percent-of-us-covid-19-deaths-are-linked-to-nursing-homes-nyt
21) (thanks to law of confusion!) Ventilators - All of the sudden, a clamour for them generated panic demand and buying. Cuomo desperate, while he sat in front of a warehouse wall full of them. Hegelian dialectics at play. Trump apparently withholding, Trump giving them out like Oprah, then the evidence that they were killing most people on them.
“A giant study that examined outcomes for more than 2,600 patients found an extraordinarily high 88% death rate among Covid-19 patients in the New York City area who had to be placed on mechanical devices to help them breathe.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-22/almost-9-in-10-covid-19-patients-on-ventilators-died-in-study
22) Testing inconsistencies:
Half of CDC Coronavirus Test Kits Are Inaccurate, Study Finds.
”The study's lead author, Sin Hang Lee, MD, director of Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, found that the testing kits gave a 30 percent false-positive rate and a 20 percent false-negative rate.”https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/half-of-cdc-coronavirus-test-kits-are-inaccurate-study-finds/ar-BB16S6M6
“According to the creator of the PCR test, Kary Mullis himself, it cannot be totally and should never be used as a tool in “the diagnosis of infectious diseases.”
https://www.weblyf.com/2020/05/coronavirus-the-truth-about-pcr-test-kit-from-the-inventor-and-other-experts/
Also, this about CT testing irregularities:
https://www.thewesterlysun.com/news/covid-19/connecticut-says-it-found-testing-flaw-90-false-positives/article_91811362-a9b3-53ab-9485-00067ce9e0d5.html
Funny how all the “mistakes” err on the side of positive...
submitted by secretymology to conspiracy [link] [comments]

Reserva Federal de EE.UU. sigue investigando cómo digitalizar el dólar mientras avanza el yuan digital

Reserva Federal de EE.UU. sigue investigando cómo digitalizar el dólar mientras avanza el yuan digital


La Reserva Federal de Estados Unidos (EE.UU.) sigue analizando los beneficios que podría generar una moneda digital en el ecosistema de pagos, para la política monetaria, la estabilidad financiera y el sector bancario de ese país.
El gobernador de la Junta de la Reserva Federal, Lael Brainard, dijo que para ello el banco central de EE.UU. ha estado probando durante los dos últimos años la DLT, reportó Coindesk.
La DLT (Distributed Ledger Technology) o Tecnología de Libro Mayor Distribuido es un sistema electrónico o base de datos para registrar información que no es ejecutada por una sola entidad. Esta permite almacenar y usar datos que pueden ser descentralizados y distribuidos tanto de forma privada como pública.
«Con estos importantes temas en mente, la Reserva Federal está activa en la realización de investigaciones y experimentación relacionadas con las tecnologías de contabilidad distribuida y los posibles casos de uso de las monedas digitales», dijo Brainard el jueves pasado, en la oficina de Innovación del Banco de la Reserva Federal de San Francisco, California.
Allí, Brainard se refirió a la pandemia del Covid-19 como un problema que reforzó la necesidad de «acceso inmediato y confiable a los fondos», que los destinatarios gastaron «rápidamente».
“La crisis del Covid-19 es un recordatorio dramático de la importancia de una infraestructura de pagos confiable y resistente que sea accesible para todos los estadounidenses”, dijo.

La idea del dólar digital sigue dando vueltas

La idea de un dólar digital como herramienta para distribuir fondos de estímulo de emergencia no es nueva.
El Congreso le ha estado dando vueltas al menos marzo pasado. Sin embargo, no se han realizado esfuerzos públicos concretos para crear una moneda digital del banco central basada en blockchain en EE.UU.
Los legisladores estadounidenses le han preguntado al presidente de la Reserva Federal, Jerome Powell, sobre los posibles beneficios de un dólar digital en el pasado.
En noviembre dijo que el banco central estaba «analizando cuidadosamente» los beneficios potenciales, así como los costos.
En ese momento, Powell afirmó que la FED no estaba desarrollando activamente un dólar digital.
Nueve meses después, Brainard comentó que las investigaciones están más avanzadas.

Mientras, sigue el avance del yuan digital

Al referirse a la existencia de otras monedas digitales y criptomonedas privadas, como bitcoin y libra, Brainard resaltó la necesidad de que Estados Unidos evalúe las criptomonedas.
“Las monedas digitales, incluidas las monedas digitales de los bancos centrales (CBDC), presentan oportunidades pero también riesgos asociados con la privacidad, la actividad ilícita y la estabilidad financiera”, consideró.
«Esta perspectiva ha intensificado los pedidos de CBDC para mantener la moneda soberana como el ancla de los sistemas de pago de la nación».
Destacó que «China ha avanzado rápidamente en su versión de un CBDC», mientras la FED necesita «permanecer en la frontera de la investigación y el desarrollo de políticas» dado el papel del dólar en el mundo.
Los proyectos pilotos del yuan digital se lanzaron a principios de año en Shenzhen, Xiongan, Chengdu y Suzhou, donde se fue incorporando en pagos de transporte, educación, atención médica y otros bienes y servicios de consumo.
Las pruebas del yuan digital o DCEP (Digital Currency Electronic Payment o moneda digital centralizada) se comenzarán a extender a otras provincias grandes de China, informó Wall Street Journal el sábado pasado en su portal web, reseñó Morocotacoin.
submitted by Morocotacoin to u/Morocotacoin [link] [comments]

Once in a LIFETIME Opportunity - Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency! WALL STREET - Crypto News Wall Street Journal - YouTube The Wall Street Journal vs. The Financial Times  Pricing ... Wallstreet Journal Article HEAR Full Version BitCoin Futures Gone Mainstream: To Be Publicly Traded By Wall Street Stock Market Investors/Bankers

Das Finanz- und Wirtschaftsportal rund um die Themen Aktien, Börse und Aktienkurse. Meinungen, Fakten, Hintergründe von Deutschlands größter Finanz-Community. The Wall Street Journal is no stranger to bitcoin. It has reported on the digital currency before, but now the publication is asking, “Do cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin have a future?” What’s particularly interesting about the article is that it presents both sides. It presents evidence to suggest that bitcoin does indeed have a future ... He pointed at an article he found on Twitter, where Wall Street Journal reportedly forecast XRP would reach $1,000 by 2020. The forecasts, which were made in October 2017, stressed that Bitcoin, Ethereum and XRP would reach $183,000, $17,000, and $1,000 respectively by January 1st 2020. View the latest BTC to USD exchange rate, news, historical charts, analyst ratings and financial information from WSJ. Bitcoin (BTC), Cryptocurrency, WSJ–While the falling crypto marketplace throughout 2018 has hurt investor wallets, it may provide some relief come tax season. According to an article published by The Wall Street Journal on Dec. 21, the plummeting value for Bitcoin and altcoins in the current bear market, with BTC prices having their worst month in November since August 2011, provides a ...

[index] [34696] [25975] [1633] [28837] [43183] [34054] [39674] [21661] [34259] [26526]

Once in a LIFETIME Opportunity - Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency! WALL STREET - Crypto News

Wall Street is FOMOing into Bitcoin! BTC and Cryptocurrency investments are a 'Once-In-A-Generation Opportunity' according to an article from Forbes. Mattie will also take a look at the latest ... Wallstreet Journal Article HEAR Full Version. Wallstreet Journal Article HEAR Full Version. Skip navigation Sign in. Search. Loading... Close. This video is unavailable. Watch Queue Queue . Watch ... Get the full teardown here: https://bit.ly/2RyMUse Subscribe to the Subscription Universe: http://bit.ly/2ndnioY On this week's #PricingPageTeardown Patrick ... Investment manias throughout the centuries have ranged from tulips to tech stocks to housing; is bitcoin different? Image/Video: Daniel Epstein Don’t miss a ... Features and interviews from The Wall Street Journal's sports, food, travel and arts & entertainment coverage. ... poured it into bitcoin and moved his family into a trailer park. In this episode ...

#